TRF Celebrates Rosie the Riveter Day!

2002

A big law associate from Houston, Texas, walked into a Georgia state courtroom as a member of the defense team. She was armed with case law, prepared to argue the facts, and ready to defend the client vigorously with her big law partner and local counsel. There was just one obstacle that she had not imagined and other counsel did not share.

The judge’s reaction to her pantsuit.

This judge did not see a lawyer standing in front of him. Instead, he noted a woman wearing clothing that he felt was better suited for a man. That judge made her sit behind the bar and eventually continued the hearing, but only after the associate found a skirt he felt suitable.

In the same year, in a different state, in a different courtroom, a different big law partner turned to the young associate, telling her that she will never be allowed to go to court again if she wouldn’t wear stilettos.  Confused, she asked, “You are talking about my shoes, right?”  Yes - he was talking about her shoes.  Big law partner: “Professional women do not wear flats”. He told her that she is too short to wear flats, anyway.

2006

The big law associate became big law counsel as she progressed to her goal of big law partner. She was very pregnant and working as if she was not, to prove that her career would not be derailed by motherhood. The big law associate was not allowed to attend a client development event because it was perceived that her pregnant belly would make clients “uncomfortable”.

2013

In a different state, in a different courtroom, the associate was now a big law partner. It was July and the air conditioner didn't work in the courtroom; it was hot. The partner took off her suit coat and her shoulders were showing. At the next break, Co-Defense counsel told her that she should never show her shoulders in a courtroom and should never take off her coat.  The partner checked with her local lawyer, seasoned trial lawyer Stan Ward, who told her to ignore Co-Defense counsel. In that same courtroom, the Partner wore flats, and she could not see over the podium; the short issue is real.

2016

While the same partner was speaking at a women's group, another panel member gave the advice that women lawyers should not attend client development social events with male clients.  It might be seen as “untoward”.  Since the partner had spent most of her career traveling and dining with her male counterparts, she completely disagreed with this advice. The following year, she decided to flip the script - and she opened her own firm.

2024

Unsurprisingly, the lawyer described above is our founder, Leah Rudnicki. Twenty-two years later, she appears in courtrooms all over the U.S., mostly wearing skirt suits or dresses in heels.  If she feels hot, she takes off her jacket and bears her shoulders. If she has a pregnant team member, she takes that team member places until she’s tired of going!  Leah always asks local counsel whether the judge has unwritten rules that need to be known.

Leah’s resilience underlies her brilliance in managing TRF, coaching team members, counseling clients, and prepping for trial. Leah and other lawyers like her encounter and endure misogynist situations regularly while educating offenders or others on the ignorance that still shows up in 2024.  

Leah T. Rudnicki, Sharon T. Thomas and Caroline J. Lewis of The Rudnicki Firm (OU Law Grads 2001, 1981 and 2014; Mom est. 2006, 1987, and 2024)

In February of this year, TRF celebrated seven years of growth and success due to the trust of our clients!  We have expanded from an all-women firm to a diverse firm which more closely mirrors the juries that we appear before.

Leah leads TRF with the underlying core belief that practicing law does not have to be miserable! It is fun, intense, and inclusive.  Not surprisingly, TRF is dedicated to advancing women (and everyone) on merit, not their style of clothing or parental status.

We firmly believe that parenthood should never be an impediment to professional success. TRF offers parental leave to mothers and fathers so they may enjoy their families and quality of life outside of the courtroom. Lawyers are human beings as surely as they are trusted professionals. No one should lose a career in exchange for creating a family.  By working with TRF, you are improving the legal field for all people!

Today, we celebrate Rosie the Riveter Day and the inclusion of all Americans in the working world:

During World War II six million women entered the workforce. "Rosie the Riveter" and her "We Can Do It" motto came to symbolize all women Home Front workers. A shortage of white male workers led to active recruitment by the United States Government of women to war industry jobs. Initially, white middle class women were recruited, followed by minority men, and finally minority women. Integration of women and minorities into the workforce was initially met with resistance; however, the new opportunities for women and minorities "cracked open" the door to equal rights and would have profound impacts on the Civil Rights Movement and Women's Movement during the following decades.

-National Park Service, Rosie the Riveter WWII Home Front

TRF is dedicated to opening more doors in the legal industry for lawyers in pants and skirts, flats and heels, and parents of children and pets. We allow legal professionals to become well-rounded humans, which only benefits our clients! Let’s normalize dressing for your day, parental leave, supporting families, and singles – together, we can remake the culture and improve the legal industry for all.

Leah's Take: the 2023 ERA Convention

ERA Convention.

In July 2023, Caroline Lewis, my daughter, and I attended the 100th Anniversary of the unveiling of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) in Seneca Falls, New York. The 1923 version was amended in 1943. In 1973, the amended version passed one of the Art. V hurdles required to be part of the US Constitution, when it was approved through Congress, and was sent to the states for ratification. Section one of the ERA is as follows:

Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.

The next Art. V Constitutional hurdle was ratification by 38 states, which was done when Virginia ratified in January 2020. Thus, the ERA has passed all constitutional requirements, and should be published and recognized as a part of the US Constitution.

Why hasn’t it been recognized? Feel free to comment as to your opinion on this question. We learned so many theories; I’m curious as to others’ thoughts. Or, if you’ve never thought about this or thought it was already in the constitution please share. We have to start discussing this everywhere.

Caroline J. Lewis and Leah T. Rudnicki

So back to Seneca Falls, Ella, Caroline, and I were the only attendees currently living in Oklahoma, and I could not find any record of another Oklahoman attending the same convention in 1923. Yet, many organizations and individuals across the US gathered outside the same church from 100 years ago in a small town in upstate New York to recreate the 1923 photo. The three Okies stood in very back of the photo and since (as was pointed out to me recently) I’m the size of a Hobbit, you can’t see us - though, we know we were there. 

Why were two civil trial attorneys and a reluctant teen from OKC attending this epic historical event?

Although Oklahoma was the first state to reject the ERA’s ratification in 1972, US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) decisions provided protections and rights for women (and all people really through the 14th Amendment). The 2022 SCOTUS took that protection away through Dobbs and continues to do so. In Dobbs, SCOTUS majority opinion specifically said that if women wanted more rights than the right to vote, then they need to vote for those rights. To be clear, when Justice Alito wrote that, and President Biden referenced his writing the 2024 State of the Union Address, the people had already used our votes to secure the 28th amendment, through the 1973 passage and the 38th state ratifying in 2020, both of which the 2022 SCOTUS and President Biden ignored.

Now, you might be thinking, Leah is making this up. I’m not. This is real life and it is supremely messed up. And we need more people discussing it.
1923
1943
1973
2023
Now 2024. That’s a long time to fight for recognition in the US Constitution.

Activists, lawyers, professors are working to obtain recognition in all ways possible.

I don’t know the full extent of why the world aligned for the three of us to be present for the renewal/revival of the ERA Movement at the 100th Anniversary of the ERA and I’m excited to see where it takes us.

If you read this far, read those first 24 words of ERA again:

Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.

Can you agree with that fundamental statement?

If you agree it should be a part of the constitution, go to www.sign4era.com to sign the petition.

If you don’t agree, I’m curious as to why not. This is not a party affiliation issue.

For more information about the ERA:

TRF Named as Tier 1 Best Law Firms in America© 2023 in Oklahoma City!

TRF Named as Tier 1 Best Law Firms in America© 2023 in Oklahoma City!

The Rudnicki Firm is closing out the year with our best one yet! For the first time in our five years of operation, TRF has been named on the Tier 1 Best Law Firms in America© 2023 list for Commercial Litigation in Oklahoma City.